Thursdays - Gatwick Airport Live - 3rd July 2025 | Thursdays - Gatwick

Show Dogs Movie Controversy - What Happened?

Thursdays - Gatwick Airport Live - 3rd July 2025 | Thursdays - Gatwick

A children's movie, "Show Dogs," which came out in 2018, sparked a lot of discussion and concern, particularly among parents and groups looking out for kids. This film, about a police dog who goes undercover at a dog show, found itself in some hot water. People started talking about it because certain parts of the movie seemed to send a very troubling message, one that many felt was a bit like how a bad person might try to prepare young ones for harmful actions. It was, you know, a pretty big deal at the time, causing quite a stir across various communities.

The core of the issue revolved around specific scenes where the main dog character, as part of the dog show judging process, had his private areas touched by strangers. This, in some respects, led to a lot of worry. Folks thought these moments could be misinterpreted by young viewers, potentially making them feel that such interactions with people they don't know are normal or even okay. It was a situation that quickly grew, with many expressing their strong feelings about what they saw as a problematic storyline.

The movie makers, Global Road, initially stood by their creative choices, saying the dog show judging was shown exactly as it happens in real life. However, the outpouring of concern from parents and child protection groups became too significant to ignore. What started as a simple family comedy about talking dogs quickly turned into a focal point for important conversations about child safety and media responsibility, so they had to act.

Table of Contents

What's the Fuss About the Show Dogs Movie Controversy?

The whole situation around the "Show Dogs" film became a pretty big deal, you know, because it touched on something very sensitive. This kids' movie, which came out in 2018, was supposed to be a lighthearted story about a dog who helps solve crimes. But, in fact, it quickly found itself at the center of a wide-ranging public discussion. People were really upset, arguing that certain parts of the story, especially how a police dog had to act in a dog show, gave off a very worrying feeling. It was like, some felt, the movie was unintentionally showing kids how someone might try to prepare them for bad actions. This was a very serious claim, and it made a lot of people take notice, sparking a good deal of worry and talk across many different groups.

For many, the main worry was that young viewers, who are still learning about the world, might not fully grasp the difference between what's okay and what's not. When the movie showed a dog getting used to having his private areas touched by people he didn't know, it seemed to blur some important lines. This, in a way, caused a lot of distress for parents and child protection advocates. They believed the film was, perhaps, giving children the wrong idea about how to react when someone tries to touch them in ways that feel strange or uncomfortable. It became a clear example of how movies for young audiences really need to think carefully about the messages they might be sending, even if those messages are not intended.

How Did the Show Dogs Movie Controversy Start?

The initial sparks of this particular "Show Dogs" movie controversy really began to fly when early viewers, especially parents and groups focused on child welfare, saw the film. They quickly picked up on scenes that involved the main canine character, Max, a Rottweiler police dog, going through the judging process at a dog show. This process, as shown in the movie, included judges touching the dogs in various places, including their private parts. It was this depiction that, you know, immediately raised red flags for many people watching.

One group, the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, was very vocal about their concerns. They put out a public statement, saying that the movie was, in fact, promoting a very unsuitable and potentially damaging idea about sexual safety for young people. They argued that by showing a dog becoming comfortable with strangers touching his private areas, the film was, in a way, coaching children into situations that could be harmful. This kind of public outcry, frankly, brought the issue to a much wider audience, making more people aware of the specific worries surrounding the film's content and its perceived messages.

The Movie Itself - What Was Show Dogs?

"Show Dogs" is, actually, a 2018 American buddy cop comedy film. It was put together by Raja Gosnell, who directed it, and the story was written by Max Botkin and Marc Hyman. The movie brought together a pretty well-known group of voices for its talking canine characters, including Will Arnett, Chris "Ludacris" Bridges, Natasha Lyonne, Jordin Sparks, Gabriel Iglesias, Shaquille O'Neal, Omar Benson Miller, Alan Cumming, and Stanley Tucci. It was, basically, meant to be a fun, family-friendly movie with a lighthearted plot about a police dog.

The main idea of the film centered on a tough police dog named Max. His mission was to go undercover at a fancy dog show to sniff out a dangerous animal smuggling ring. To do this, he had to pretend to be one of the show dogs, which, you know, involved learning how to act like a pampered show animal and, crucially, going through the judging process. This setup was, in some respects, the very core of the story, leading to many funny moments and, as it turned out, the source of all the serious talk.

The Troubling Scenes in Show Dogs

The scenes that caused so much trouble in "Show Dogs" were those showing the dog show judging. In these moments, the police dog character, Max, had to endure a thorough check-over by the judges. This, in fact, included them touching his teeth, his tail, and, yes, his private parts. The movie presented these moments as a necessary part of the dog show routine, and it showed Max, who was initially uncomfortable, eventually getting used to it and even, you know, seeming to enjoy the attention.

It was this progression, from discomfort to acceptance, that really worried many parents and child protection groups. They felt that showing a character, even a dog, becoming comfortable with unknown people touching his private areas could send a very mixed and potentially harmful idea to young viewers. Parents argued that it could, in a way, make children less wary of inappropriate touching from strangers, or even from people they know. This was, in essence, the heart of the "Show Dogs" movie controversy, as it seemed to contradict vital lessons about personal safety and boundaries that children are taught.

How Did the Production Company Respond to the Show Dogs Movie Controversy?

When the complaints about "Show Dogs" first started to pile up, Global Road Entertainment, the company behind the film, actually responded by standing by the scenes in question. They put out a statement explaining that the way dog show judging was shown in the movie was, in fact, completely accurate to how it's done at shows all over the world. Their initial stance was that they were just showing reality, and there was nothing wrong with that. It was, basically, a defense of their creative choices and the way they had chosen to present the dog show environment.

However, the talk and the strong feelings against the movie didn't die down. The criticism, you know, just kept growing, with more and more parents and advocacy groups speaking out. This widespread anger and worry about the movie's perceived message on how to prepare children for bad actions became too much for the company to ignore. So, Global Road Entertainment eventually changed its tune. They announced that they had decided to immediately take out two of the most problematic scenes from the film. This was a pretty big move, especially since the movie had already been released in theaters.

Why Did Parents and Groups Speak Up About Show Dogs?

Parents and child advocacy groups spoke up about the "Show Dogs" movie controversy for some very serious reasons. They were, you know, deeply concerned that the film, despite its innocent-seeming plot, was sending a very worrying idea to young children. The main point of contention was the idea that the movie was, in a way, coaching children to be okay with certain types of physical contact that are, in fact, not okay. This was seen as a dangerous message, particularly when it came from a film aimed at a young audience.

Many parents felt that the movie was, perhaps, undermining the important lessons they try to teach their children about personal boundaries and how to react when someone touches them in a way that feels wrong. They argued that if a character, even a dog, is shown to become comfortable with inappropriate touching, it could confuse young minds and make them less likely to report similar experiences in their own lives. It was, essentially, a call for media that serves children to be much more thoughtful about how it portrays sensitive topics, especially those related to safety and personal space.

The Aftermath - What Happened Next for Show Dogs?

After all the strong negative reactions and claims that "Show Dogs" was, in a way, showing something like sexual harm, the company decided to take some pretty drastic steps. Global Road Entertainment announced that they would be getting rid of two specific scenes from the movie, even though it had already been released. This decision was made quickly, as a direct response to the widespread public outcry. It was, basically, an effort to address the serious worries that parents and advocacy groups had raised.

The new, changed version of the film was made available very soon after the announcement. In some places, the controversial movie was even pulled from movie houses entirely, as parents sounded the alarm about the unsuitable content in its story. The production company, in fact, promised to alter the scenes to remove the offending material. This whole situation became a pretty big example of how public opinion can really affect what happens with a movie, especially when it comes to something as sensitive as children's safety.

Common Reactions and Thoughts on the Show Dogs Movie Controversy

The "Show Dogs" movie controversy really brought out a wide range of feelings and thoughts from people. Some critics, you know, were incredibly harsh, calling the film the "cinematic equivalent of stepping in dog shit," which is, obviously, a very strong way to say it was a truly awful film. This kind of reaction showed just how much the movie missed the mark for some viewers, not just because of the controversy, but also because of its overall quality.

On the other hand, there were discussions about the broader context of child safety. Some people pointed out that the idea of "stranger danger" is, actually, a bit old-fashioned. They highlighted that most harm to young people comes from those they already know, like family members, friends, or coaches, rather than unknown individuals. This perspective, in a way, added another layer to the discussion, suggesting that while the movie's portrayal was problematic, the focus on "stranger danger" might be missing a larger point about child safety education. Common Sense Media, a well-known resource for parents, also provided its own review and age rating for "Show Dogs," giving parents a guide to help them decide if the movie was right for their children.

This article has explored the "Show Dogs" movie controversy, detailing how a children's film about a police dog sparked widespread concern due to scenes depicting a dog becoming comfortable with strangers touching his private areas. We looked at how parents and advocacy groups, like the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, raised alarms about the film sending a troubling message about sexual safety to young viewers. The piece also covered the movie's background as a 2018 buddy cop comedy, the specific nature of the scenes that caused distress, and the initial defense from the production company, Global Road Entertainment. Finally, we discussed the company's decision to remove the controversial scenes, the subsequent release of a revised version, and the broader reactions and thoughts surrounding the whole situation.

Thursdays - Gatwick Airport Live - 3rd July 2025 | Thursdays - Gatwick
Thursdays - Gatwick Airport Live - 3rd July 2025 | Thursdays - Gatwick

View Details

Eye on Comics live auction for Thursday, July 3! | Welcome to the Eye
Eye on Comics live auction for Thursday, July 3! | Welcome to the Eye

View Details

Adelaide Concert - Whats The Show
Adelaide Concert - Whats The Show

View Details

About the Author

Ashleigh Weissnat DVM

Username: rraynor
Email: green88@gmail.com
Birthdate: 1983-04-04
Address: 68408 Gutmann Falls Apt. 499 West Burnice, OK 63965
Phone: 956-753-4460
Company: O'Connell, Zieme and Bruen
Job: Insurance Claims Clerk
Bio: Ea iure quaerat qui delectus tempora nisi sed aut. A mollitia quo sed esse velit nostrum. Fuga consequatur commodi ratione laudantium ut.

Connect with Ashleigh Weissnat DVM